
Featured Image: Fingerprint. SOURCE: publicdomainpictures.net
Published on Nov 1, 2014
Court rules fingerprints have no fifth amendment right. What does this mean for the rest of our biometric data?
Featured Image: Fingerprint. SOURCE: publicdomainpictures.net
Published on Nov 1, 2014
Court rules fingerprints have no fifth amendment right. What does this mean for the rest of our biometric data?
From Godfathers Politics posted on by Giacomo
What is the real issue at hand concerning the attempted raping of the Second Amendment rights of American citizens? Is it really about preventing more violence or protecting our children? Or is it something else completely different being hidden under the guise of preventing violence.
Here is Obama’s understanding of the Second Amendment:
“I, like most Americans, believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms. We have a strong tradition of gun ownership in this country and the vast majority of gun owners act responsibly…”
“We recognize the traditions of gun ownership that passes on from generation to generation, that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national heritage.”
In a dangerous mass brainwashing campaign, President Barack Obama has been telling the nation that the Second Amendment is all about hunters and hunting. The reason he is doing that is because so many Americans today abhor hunting and will get behind his efforts to start banning guns and ammunition. I’m actually surprised he’s not running scenes from Bambi where Bambi’s father gets shot by a hunter. . . . Read Complete Report
From youtube uploaded by BibleandAmerica Published on Jul 27, 2012
The Second Amendment is About Fighting Tyranny
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
from youtube uploaded by antiprise
Criminals For Gun Control 1 Home Invasion
Uploaded on Apr 3, 2009
Violent criminals advocate stronger gun laws to foster a safer work environment and limit their exposure to risk. Second posting. After nearly 250,000 views an unfounded privacy violation complaint led to the video being removed. Well, here it is again. Copyright 2007 Antiprise Records. Written and performed by Sebastian Deledda. Music by William Brainard and Sebastian Deledda.
Criminals For Gun Control Part 2 – Carjacking
from youtube uploaded by iq201
Uploaded on Aug 14, 2008
Violent criminals advocate gun control legislation to foster a safer work environment. Carjacker gives interview before burying corpse of victim. This video is produced by the Youtube user “antiprise”. It’s in the comedy section because it’s darn funny in a dark sort of way. The message is strong.
And last but not least, Archie Bunker gave us the sensible answer to gun control long before 9/11, on the “All in the Family” TV show, . . . EDITOR
Archie Bunker on Gun Control
from youtube uploaded by greatonyak on Nov 22, 2006
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Go a Little Deeper:
from The American Dream
Should it be legal for the U.S. government to spend billions of dollars on propaganda designed to change public opinion in the United States? Should it be legal for the U.S. government to use television, radio, newspapers, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, blogs and Internet forums to conduct “psychological operations” targeted at the American public? An amendment that has been added to a new defense bill in Congress would make it legal to target propaganda and “psychological operations” directly at U.S. citizens. The latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act would overturn the Smith-Mundt Actof 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987. Those two laws essentially make it illegal for propaganda that is used to influence public opinion overseas to be targeted at U.S. citizens back here at home. If those two laws are struck down, there will be essentially very few limits to what the U.S. government can do to shape our opinions. The government would be able to bombard us with propaganda messages on television, on the radio, in our newspapers and on the Internet and there would not even be a requirement that those messages be true. In fact, just as happens so often overseas, it would likely be inevitable that the government would purposely disseminate misinformation to the American public for the sake of “national security”. That is why it is imperative that this bill not become law.
As an article posted on LegalInsurrection.com correctly noted, this bill has already been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives…. . . . Read Complete Report