“In early October, U.S. officials accused Iranian operatives of planning to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States on American soil. Iran denied the charges, but the episode has already managed to increase tensions between Washington and Tehran. Although the Obama administration has not publicly threatened to retaliate with military force, the allegations have underscored the real and growing risk that the two sides could go to war sometime soon — particularly over Iran’s advancing nuclear program.”
the articles conclusion:
“The truth is that a military strike intended to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, if managed carefully, could spare the region and the world a very real threat and dramatically improve the long-term national security of the United States.” . . . read complete article
So let me get this straight a “military strike” “against Iran if “managed carefully” would be cool right now?
We are suppose to be winding down from the past 10 years of war; healing our wounded, and getting our own house in order, yet the magazine that has been called “the most influential policy magazine in the world” wants us caught up in another war. I guess the CFR is looking out for the huge US Military-Industrial complex. It’s a shame no one listened when President Eisenhower warned us of this situation. . . . EDITOR