Tag Archive for Obama lawsuit

Continuing Coverage: Media Blackout in Obama Georgia Ballot Eligibility Case

It it quite obvious to me that the main stream press will not report ANYTHING that would upset the applecart when it comes to the liberal arm of the Controllers two headed cartel.  If the media was free to report the news without outside censoring this story would be heard loud and clear every hour on the hour and half-hour  in every household in the U.S., especially on the “no spin” Fox network,.  But as of yet not a peep. Controlled media? . . . EDITOR 

from the American Thinker

By Cindy Simpson

January 30, 2012

Last week, I noted that Obama turned his back not just on Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer, but also on the laws of the State of Georgia.  I closed my column, “Georgia Ballot Challenge: Obama Walks on By,” with the observation: “And most of the media has followed along right behind him.”

At the time, I had just witnessed an historic hearing that actually discussed the eligibility of the sitting president of the United States to run for a second term.  The president had been subpoenaed to appear, and instead of his attorney respectfully following protocol to have that subpoena recalled, both Obama and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, simply failed to show up at all or offer any defense whatsoever.

Isn’t there a headline in there somewhere? . . . Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/media_blackout_in_obama_georgia_ballot_eligibility_case.html#ixzz1lA8LMQu1

Previous Posts:

1/29/12: Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012

1/22/12: Judge Refuse to squelch subpoena for Obama to appear at a hearing to determine Eligibilty to Run in 2012

 

Continuing Coverage: Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012

As we continue to cover this on-going story we wonder; How long before the main stream press considers this story important enough to cover? . . . EDITOR

Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012

September 25, 2011

The purpose of this project is to gather in one place the information needed to challenge Obamas name being placed on the ballot in each of the states, so that voters in each state know the process of how to challenge a candidates name being placed on the ballot.

For each state, there is a link for the Secretary of States office. If there is no additional information, it means that there is no information on that page regarding the process ( if any ) to challenge a candidates name before or after it is placed on the ballot ( both for the primaries and general election ). This is where you come in. We need people to contact their states Secretary of State and find what the rules are for challenging a candidate ( for example, the number of days before or after a name is placed on the ballot when one can legally challenge ). Once you have that information, send it to me at the Contact link above and it will be posted ( once verified ) so that others will know the process. Remember, all it takes is one state to challenge the ballot !!! . . . visit site

Previous report: THE OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE GOES TO TRIAL IN GEORGIA

Obama Sued over National Defense Authorization Act

from The Raw Story

Journalist Chris Hedges sues Obama over National Defense Authorization Act

By Eric W. Dolan
Monday, January 16, 2012

Less than a month after the National Defense Authorization Act was signed into law, President Barack Obama faces a lawsuit because of its highly controversial provisions regarding the detention of suspected terrorists.

Attorneys Carl J. Mayer and Bruce I. Afran filed a complaint against Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta Friday in the Southern U.S. District Court in New York City on behalf of journalist Chris Hedges. The complaint states that the law violates the First and Fifth Amendments.

The $662 billion defense spending bill contained a controversial section that required terrorism suspects to be detained by the military without trial, regardless of where they were captured.

Despite language in the law that states it does not affect existing authorities relating to the detention of U.S. citizens or others captured within the U.S., Hedges claims that it still allows the government to detain Americans indefinitely without trial. . . read complete report