Illustration thanx to Dees Illustrations
Published on Apr 2, 2013
Video produced by http://www.westernjournalism.com
Photo: Harold Pratt House, NYC. Headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations. CREDIT: Gryffindor SOURCE: Wikipedia (This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license).
From The IntelHub
By JG Vibes
December 30, 2012
“Today there are many organizations that work over top of our government which have been put into place by the modern day feudal oligarchy. Many times these organizations are called “think tanks” or “policy institutes“.
Policy institute is the more appropriate term, because these are the organizations that set the political policy and hand it down to the politicians.” . . .
… “This week the CFR was in the news again, after a security breach revealed that their website had been hosting malware for days. This malware is allegedly used to track and spy on the people who visit the website, and some are even suggesting that this aspect of their security breach may be an inside job to gather information about people who are interested in the CFR.” . . . Read Complete Report
from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
On Monday, January 17, 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell address warned the nation to guard against the influence of a rising “military-industrial complex.” That nexus of military, industrial, technological, and congressional interests has expanded considerably since Eisenhower’s cautionary speech, says military affairs analyst Leslie H. Gelb. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who has invoked Eisenhower’s warnings in the past year, recently promised $78 billion in cuts over the next several years, but Gelb says it’s unclear whether this will happen and what those cuts will be. Stressing the need for the federal budget to focus more on bolstering the economy–rather than a huge military–Gelb says he would advise President Barack Obama to make a strong case to the public for why the economy and jobs are “essential for the maintenance of democracy, for the maintenance of our economic competitiveness and our schools, and for our military security in the world.”
Wasn’t the military budget at the time of Eisenhower’s speech much less than it is today, in comparable figures?
You’re right, if you do it in constant dollars. Compare how much we are spending on the military Eisenhower’s farewell address, today, which would be about $750 billion a year. If you compare the Eisenhower budget in today’s dollars, it would be a little more than half, or $400 billion. So there is a huge difference, and he went out of his way even then to warn of the growth of the military spending.
What caused Eisenhower, who led the allied troops in Europe during World War II, to be so concerned?. . .Read Complete Report
Go DEEPER: THEI Video 101